Life Invasion

Going beyond the word Stalker and Stalking, the core action, beyond boundaries and paramiters is Life Invasion.

This form of action should be seen as a mindset, and it can appear in other areas of a stalker's life. For example, A woman who counts down at the traffic lights on red. Assuming they will turn green at the same time they say zero. Instead of waiting for green, they choose to drive through the red light when they stop speaking, choosing themselves over reality. The problem awakens when the child in the passenger seat screams stop while fearing for their life, that is meant to be in a guided persons hands.

Later, the list is long, the stalking begins at schools, people's homes, supermarkets and setting up deceptive meetings with children in parks on behalf of another female stalker who can be found at schools without warning. What we understand is the harm they cause to others when it is noted at an extreme. We may only learn too late that the stalker thinks entirley different to a guided person performing tasks and routines in many areas of life. So, can you spot a stalker when they are not stalking? Yes.

Should you assume someone who acts odd is a stalker? It is a cluster of actions and statements that can give it away. One thing to note, they are trying really hard to hide behind a mask while projecting an image into your perception. Sounds convincing. It is, most of the time. The giveaway is that they are doing that thing that gives it away, and the time and energy to do so will show.

If you practice at something, you get good at it. That goes for the unsavagery. The mindset will appear to believe they can say and do what they like in times when guided people would think twice. Guidance is not a weakness; it's a foundation of consideration built over time. So you are saying very inconsiderate people who keep their own council are high risk? Do they chip, poke, or say the wrong thing with backhanded comments? Do they manipulate people and children for personal gain and never appear to change?

If they lack a moral code, empathy, gaslight and cover up, the nthe reality they live in can't be the same as everyone elses or the actions would be different. When access is removed, the colour of the traffic lights won't matter.

Warning: Anyone turning up at a children's school without warning is a stalker. Anyone following you to see where you live is a stalker.

If they appear at a place of work, worship, or social gathering without warning, post something when the subtext is sinister; it is stalking. If the stalker activates you to react, that is classed as BAITING. What would some stalk and bait? They want to have what you have; they want you to feel their pain that they cannot process, so it must be you who is the cause, not them. If the red light meant anything, the car. would have remained at the traffic lights until the greenlight suggest "It is safe, you can go now." A stalker doesn't see safe and unsafe, all they see is the false reflect in the mirror.

The giveaway is that the child is not seen as a child, not the way other adults would see and feel the situation with consideration. So stalking is not about you? It is an it isn't. Objects that stimulate the damaged emotional system. The dark side is that if all humans are seen as objects, and always have been, they don't know how we feel about each other. They only assume we are like them, and they are just making the bold move without guidance, as guidance is not understood. Empathy, consideration, and accountability can all be like a second language, never to be understood.

"What are you on about?" Could be one stalker reply to avoid a spotlight, or when questioned on empathy. The giveaway is not to be frustrated about. A person may never know what you are on about. Call the authorities, get a non-mulistration order listed, they don't speak your language, the authorities can speak to them if they default on the non-molistration order.